Discussion
Thyroid cancer is rare in patients younger than 19 years. The recent publication of the “GPOH-MET” for the years 1995-2019 included 354 patients (3), thus there was approximately 14 patients/year in Germany. In the Netherlands, over a 43-year period, 170 patients were identified (12). Although most studies include all patients aged less than 19 years, DTC seems to be more aggressive in patients younger than 10 years of age than in adolescents (3,13,14). Thus, adolescent DTC seems to present a specific entity, which we believed warranted special focus, hence the present study.
In the present study, pT1 and pT2 status were frequent and comparable to the literature on adolescent DTC, identified in 73.9% of the cohort compared to rates of 69.6% and 58.4% previously reported by Markovina et al. (5) and Spinelli et al. (4). Similarly, rates of lymph node involvement were also comparable to those reported in similar groups, at 57.1% in the present study versus 60% reported by Spinelli et al. (4) and 65.2% reported by Markovina et al. (5). The rate of PTC follicular variant (40.9%), however, was higher in our cohort compared to these earlier studies, that reported rates of 24.8% (4) and 20.6% (5) and also when compared to a report from the USA of 15% (13). The reasons underlying these differences might be due to demographic, ethnic and/or environmental differences, but addressing this point would go beyond the scope of this study.
We observed a recurrence/persistence rate of 17.3% at a median follow-up of slightly more than five years. In contrast, Markovina et al. (5) reported recurrence in 35.7% of patients with a median follow-up duration of 18.1 years. Most recurrences observed in their study occurred within the first 10 years. One reason for the discrepancy might be because they also included some patients younger than 10 years, in whom DTC seems to be more aggressive (3,13,14). Moreover, the median follow-up of 60.7 months in our study may have missed some longer term recurrences.
The proportion of patients undergoing central lymphadenectomy in the cohort of Markovina et al. (5) was similar to ours (70%), but undergoing central lymphadenectomy did not correlate with recurrence in their study. Both our data and the currently available evidence do not allow the development of clear recommendations concerning prophylactic central lymphadenectomy for adolescent DTC. In the recent Dutch guidelines for pediatric DTC, prophylactic lymphadenectomy is not recommended in patients <18 years with a negative comprehensive ultrasound exam of all neck regions performed by a radiologist experienced in head and neck imaging (15,16). However supporters of prophylactic central lymph node dissection underline the problems associated with decades of long-term follow-up, pleading for treatments that minimize the risk of persistence and recurrence (17).
Another possible reason for the higher recurrence rate reported by Markovina et al. (5) might be that 18% patients did not initially receive 131I therapy. Routine postoperative RAIT is currently recommended in children and adolescents with tumors >1 cm in Germany and in the Netherlands (12,18). The pediatric ATA guidelines recommend 131I only for nodal or other loco-regional disease that is not amenable to surgery, as well as for distant metastases that are known or presumed to be iodine-avid (7). In addition, some experts also advocate routine 131I therapy for children with T3 tumors or extensive regional nodal involvement (N1a or N1b) (7). Another factor to consider is that some recent evidence has been presented suggesting that there is an increased risk of leukemia or solid cancers more than 20 years after childhood RAIT (19).
The recent data published by Redlich et al. (3) indicate age <10 years at diagnosis, ATA high-risk level, and poor response to initial therapy as significant negative prognostic factors for event free survival in pediatric DTC (5). This might help to tailor a risk-adapted individualized therapy, restricting the need for prophylactic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant RAIT for poor responders to initial treatment. Molecular pathology (20,21) and new additional diagnostic tools, such as detection of circulating tumor cells in patients’ blood might also play a role for guiding treatment in the future (22).